[aur-general] Disown request

[James Bulmer]

just as a note, python2-repoze-lru only dependency is python2-routes so
there will be no need for python2-repoze-lru after these changes


On Tue, Mar 11, 2014 at 1:19 PM, James Bulmer <nekinie at gmail.com> wrote:

> Awesome,
>
> so if you disown python2-repoze.lru, I will update the package and deploy
> (after lunch). Then we can disown / delete python2-repoze-lru once the
> new python2-routes has been deployed
>
> Sound like a plan?
>
>
> On Tue, Mar 11, 2014 at 1:12 PM, Felix Yan <felixonmars at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> On Tuesday, March 11, 2014 12:54:05 James Bulmer wrote:
>> > Hi.
>> >
>> > Earlier today I put a request in to disown python2-routes, I now
>> > need python2-repoze-lru which is a dependency of python2-routes. It had
>> the
>> > same owner and is the same situation of not being updated in the last 2
>> > years.
>> >
>> > Thanks again
>> > -- James
>>
>> Actually I prefer "python2-repoze.lru" as the naming scheme, since it
>> follows
>> upstream, and most repoze packages in the AUR are named in this way
>> (python2-
>> repoze-lru being the only exception).
>>
>> So I'll suggest to merge python2-repoze-lru into python2-repoze.lru, and
>> disown python2-repoze.lru which didn't update for even longer, and the
>> maintainer has half of his packages out-of-date.
>>
>> What do you think?
>>
>> Regards,
>> Felix Yan
>
>
>