[aur-general] Quick question about sl

[Karol Blazewicz]

On Fri, Mar 14, 2014 at 8:16 AM, David Phillips <dbphillipsnz at gmail.com> wrote:
> Please excuse me if this isn't the right list for this (I feel
> confident it is), but is there any reason why is it that something
> that's as reasonably update- and maintenance-free as
> http://aur.archlinux.org/packages/sl not in community yet? It's got
> over three hundred votes; is there a reason for it staying out of
> community? I can understand the viewpoint of it being such a small
> package that it's not worth the time and space on mirrors, but still?
>
> Wow, I'm proof reading this message just now and it sounds more
> demanding than intended.
>
> Cheers all
> --
> David Phillips
> GPG Key 0x7BF3D17D0884BF5B
> Fingerprint 2426 235A 7831 AA2F 56AF  4BC0 7BF3 D17D 0884 BF5B

It's not exactly essential. If some dev or TU wants to pick it, he
will. People tend to maintain packages they use.