[aur-general] Quick question about sl

[David Phillips]

Ahh, okay, that makes sense. I thought that would be the case -- these
guys 'n' gals are volunteers after all.

On 14/03/2014, Karol Blazewicz <karol.blazewicz at gmail.com> wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 14, 2014 at 8:16 AM, David Phillips <dbphillipsnz at gmail.com>
> wrote:
>> Please excuse me if this isn't the right list for this (I feel
>> confident it is), but is there any reason why is it that something
>> that's as reasonably update- and maintenance-free as
>> http://aur.archlinux.org/packages/sl not in community yet? It's got
>> over three hundred votes; is there a reason for it staying out of
>> community? I can understand the viewpoint of it being such a small
>> package that it's not worth the time and space on mirrors, but still?
>>
>> Wow, I'm proof reading this message just now and it sounds more
>> demanding than intended.
>>
>> Cheers all
>> --
>> David Phillips
>> GPG Key 0x7BF3D17D0884BF5B
>> Fingerprint 2426 235A 7831 AA2F 56AF  4BC0 7BF3 D17D 0884 BF5B
>
> It's not exactly essential. If some dev or TU wants to pick it, he
> will. People tend to maintain packages they use.
>


-- 
David Phillips
GPG Key 0x7BF3D17D0884BF5B
Fingerprint 2426 235A 7831 AA2F 56AF  4BC0 7BF3 D17D 0884 BF5B