[aur-general] Package naming where sources are not official

[David Phillips]

Hi all, I adopted https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/trayfreq/ a while
ago to nurture it back into health after seeing that it was trying to
use outdated files in /proc/ amongst other fatal bugs. The owners
haven't updated their sourceforge in a while (five years), so decided
to have a hack at rewriting it myself to work with modern
installations. That's enough background, it's mostly working now, but
the PKGBUILD is pointing to my source code.

Question: Should I have the aur package renamed to account for the
fact it's not using the 'true', 'official' sources even though those
haven't worked for years?

Cheers for your opinions.
-- 
David Phillips
GPG Key 0x7BF3D17D0884BF5B
Fingerprint 2426 235A 7831 AA2F 56AF  4BC0 7BF3 D17D 0884 BF5B