[aur-general] Copy.com dueling packages

[Sam S.]

On Tue, Apr 2, 2013 at 5:59 PM, Jonathan Arnold <jdarnold at buddydog.org> wrote:
> There are 2 packages for the Copy.com client software package:
>
> copy - https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/copy/
> copy-agent - https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/copy-agent/
>
> [...]
> I'm not really sure how this should be resolved, mostly because I
> wouldn't pick one over the other right now.

A year later, it's now clear that "copy-agent" is the package that
should be kept, since...
 - it works
 - it is well maintained (updates appear shortly after upstream releases)
 - it even installs systemd units and browser plugins

The "copy" package should be deleted, as...
 - it is broken
 - it has been flagged out-of-date for 10 months now with not reaction
from the maintainer
 - it is badly named

Can one of TUs please take care of this?
Thanks!