[aur-general] Copy.com dueling packages
xyne at archlinux.ca
Thu May 1 17:04:43 EDT 2014
On 2014-05-01 18:56 +0200
Sam S. wrote:
>On Tue, Apr 2, 2013 at 5:59 PM, Jonathan Arnold <jdarnold at buddydog.org> wrote:
>> There are 2 packages for the Copy.com client software package:
>> copy - https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/copy/
>> copy-agent - https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/copy-agent/
>> I'm not really sure how this should be resolved, mostly because I
>> wouldn't pick one over the other right now.
>A year later, it's now clear that "copy-agent" is the package that
>should be kept, since...
> - it works
> - it is well maintained (updates appear shortly after upstream releases)
> - it even installs systemd units and browser plugins
>The "copy" package should be deleted, as...
> - it is broken
> - it has been flagged out-of-date for 10 months now with not reaction
>from the maintainer
> - it is badly named
>Can one of TUs please take care of this?
More information about the aur-general