[aur-general] [AUR4] Single binary package for different architectures

Reventlov contact+aur+general at volcanis.me
Sun Jun 14 14:19:45 UTC 2015


Le Sun, 14 Jun 2015 15:51:02 +0200,
Johannes Löthberg <johannes at kyriasis.com> a écrit :

> In which way is it cleaner and more structured? It's a bash hack
> instead of actually using properly structured and supported features.

Please take this not-a-bug https://bugs.archlinux.org/task/43714 in
consideration, too.

It's why i'm not using this structure, personnally: if I did, i'd have
to use unique names for each architecture dependant source, and change
my package function and/or my build function to take thoses unique
names into account.

A bash hack inside a bash script is not this bad.

Rémy Grünblatt
Site Monod
Tél. :
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 819 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <https://lists.archlinux.org/pipermail/aur-general/attachments/20150614/527fcd2b/attachment.asc>

More information about the aur-general mailing list