[aur-general] [AUR4] Single binary package for different architectures
johannes at kyriasis.com
Sun Jun 14 14:28:45 UTC 2015
On 14/06, Reventlov wrote:
>> In which way is it cleaner and more structured? It's a bash hack
>> instead of actually using properly structured and supported features.
>Please take this not-a-bug https://bugs.archlinux.org/task/43714 in
>It's why i'm not using this structure, personnally: if I did, i'd have
>to use unique names for each architecture dependant source, and change
>my package function and/or my build function to take thoses unique
>names into account.
>A bash hack inside a bash script is not this bad.
I don't see how that is relevant anymore since the AUR doesn't use
PGP Key ID: 0x50FB9B273A9D0BB5
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Size: 1495 bytes
Desc: not available
More information about the aur-general