[aur-general] [AUR4] Single binary package for different architectures

[Johannes Löthberg]

On 14/06, Reventlov wrote:
>> In which way is it cleaner and more structured? It's a bash hack
>> instead of actually using properly structured and supported features.
>>
>
>Please take this not-a-bug https://bugs.archlinux.org/task/43714 in
>consideration, too.
>
>It's why i'm not using this structure, personnally: if I did, i'd have
>to use unique names for each architecture dependant source, and change
>my package function and/or my build function to take thoses unique
>names into account.
>
>A bash hack inside a bash script is not this bad.
>

I don't see how that is relevant anymore since the AUR doesn't use 
sourceballs anymore.

-- 
Sincerely,
  Johannes Löthberg
  PGP Key ID: 0x50FB9B273A9D0BB5
  https://theos.kyriasis.com/~kyrias/
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 1495 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <https://lists.archlinux.org/pipermail/aur-general/attachments/20150614/204aa0c1/attachment.asc>