[aur-general] [AUR4] Single binary package for different architectures
johannes at kyriasis.com
Sun Jun 14 14:31:59 UTC 2015
On 14/06, Johannes Löthberg wrote:
>On 14/06, Reventlov wrote:
>>>In which way is it cleaner and more structured? It's a bash hack
>>>instead of actually using properly structured and supported features.
>>Please take this not-a-bug https://bugs.archlinux.org/task/43714 in
>>It's why i'm not using this structure, personnally: if I did, i'd have
>>to use unique names for each architecture dependant source, and change
>>my package function and/or my build function to take thoses unique
>>names into account.
>>A bash hack inside a bash script is not this bad.
>I don't see how that is relevant anymore since the AUR doesn't use
And it will also make it not show up in the AUR properly since the
sources won't be parsed properly.
PGP Key ID: 0x50FB9B273A9D0BB5
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Size: 1495 bytes
Desc: not available
More information about the aur-general