[aur-general] [AUR4] Single binary package for different architectures

Johannes Löthberg johannes at kyriasis.com
Sun Jun 14 14:31:59 UTC 2015

On 14/06, Johannes Löthberg wrote:
>On 14/06, Reventlov wrote:
>>>In which way is it cleaner and more structured? It's a bash hack
>>>instead of actually using properly structured and supported features.
>>Please take this not-a-bug https://bugs.archlinux.org/task/43714 in
>>consideration, too.
>>It's why i'm not using this structure, personnally: if I did, i'd have
>>to use unique names for each architecture dependant source, and change
>>my package function and/or my build function to take thoses unique
>>names into account.
>>A bash hack inside a bash script is not this bad.
>I don't see how that is relevant anymore since the AUR doesn't use 
>sourceballs anymore.

And it will also make it not show up in the AUR properly since the 
sources won't be parsed properly.

  Johannes Löthberg
  PGP Key ID: 0x50FB9B273A9D0BB5
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 1495 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <https://lists.archlinux.org/pipermail/aur-general/attachments/20150614/e0ba3d6d/attachment-0001.asc>

More information about the aur-general mailing list