[aur-general] [AUR4] Single binary package for different architectures

[Bruno Pagani]

Le 14/06/2015 16:31, Johannes Löthberg a écrit :
> On 14/06, Johannes Löthberg wrote:
>> On 14/06, Reventlov wrote:
>>>> In which way is it cleaner and more structured? It's a bash hack
>>>> instead of actually using properly structured and supported features.
>>>>
>>>
>>> Please take this not-a-bug https://bugs.archlinux.org/task/43714 in
>>> consideration, too.
>>>
>>> It's why i'm not using this structure, personnally: if I did, i'd have
>>> to use unique names for each architecture dependant source, and change
>>> my package function and/or my build function to take thoses unique
>>> names into account.
>>>
>>> A bash hack inside a bash script is not this bad.
>>>
>>
>> I don't see how that is relevant anymore since the AUR doesn't use
>> sourceballs anymore.
>>
>
> And it will also make it not show up in the AUR properly since the
> sources won't be parsed properly.
>

I’m not sure to understand you. How would you package this one for instance:

https://aur4.archlinux.org/packages/chromium-pepper-flash-standalone/

?

Bruno



-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 473 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <https://lists.archlinux.org/pipermail/aur-general/attachments/20150622/f69a84e6/attachment.asc>