[aur-general] AUR mailing lists - Was: Removal requests
johannes at kyriasis.com
Sat Jun 20 12:08:14 UTC 2015
On 20/06, Johannes Dewender wrote:
>Am 20.06.2015 um 13:34 schrieb Johannes Löthberg:
>> On 20/06, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
>> Those kinds of questions are often at least acceptable on aur-general,
>> though arch-general might be more appropriate. But they really belong in
>> community places for said software.
>Well, for anything that is somewhat controversial I think aur-general is
>fine, since aur-requests probably doesn't have many subscribers
>(especially not many non-TUs).
>However, I don't think these package removals were controversial.
I wasn't talking about requests at all. Those should be on the
aur-requests ML, possibly CCing the maintainer yourself if you don't
open a proper AUR request which will CC them automatically.
>I contacted the owner of these packages and included a link to this
>discussion and asked what's the problem he tries to solve, since at
>least one of the packages was recent (from this year).
>The deletion showed that this is not the right solution,
>but he probably still wants to solve his problem ;-)
PGP Key ID: 0x50FB9B273A9D0BB5
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Size: 1495 bytes
Desc: not available
More information about the aur-general