[aur-general] AUR mailing lists - Was: Removal requests

Johannes Löthberg johannes at kyriasis.com
Sat Jun 20 12:08:14 UTC 2015

On 20/06, Johannes Dewender wrote:
>Am 20.06.2015 um 13:34 schrieb Johannes Löthberg:
>> On 20/06, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
>> Those kinds of questions are often at least acceptable on aur-general,
>> though arch-general might be more appropriate. But they really belong in
>> community places for said software.
>Well, for anything that is somewhat controversial I think aur-general is
>fine, since aur-requests probably doesn't have many subscribers
>(especially not many non-TUs).
>However, I don't think these package removals were controversial.

I wasn't talking about requests at all. Those should be on the 
aur-requests ML, possibly CCing the maintainer yourself if you don't 
open a proper AUR request which will CC them automatically.

>I contacted the owner of these packages and included a link to this
>discussion and asked what's the problem he tries to solve, since at
>least one of the packages was recent (from this year).
>The deletion showed that this is not the right solution,
>but he probably still wants to solve his problem ;-)

  Johannes Löthberg
  PGP Key ID: 0x50FB9B273A9D0BB5
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 1495 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <https://lists.archlinux.org/pipermail/aur-general/attachments/20150620/9b6ba934/attachment.asc>

More information about the aur-general mailing list