[aur-general] Name for an (almost) fake package
Bartłomiej Piotrowski
bpiotrowski at archlinux.org
Fri Apr 8 05:56:37 UTC 2016
On 2016-04-08 03:26, 张海 wrote:
> I'd like to package another version of the AUR package android-sdk (
> https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/android-sdk/), but without any content
> in `/opt/android-sdk`, solely for managing package dependency and misc
> files such as icon, desktop file and profile script. The real content of
> the package should be managed by user itself under `/opt/android-sdk`,
> outside of pacman. (This is a preference for some users like me.)
>
> Since it does not come with most of the package content, should I call it
> `android-sdk-fake`? But since it does come with the depenencies and misc
> files, it is not a "really fake" package. Should I go with
> `android-sdk-almost-fake` or something like that?
>
You should ask android-sdk maintainer to put these files into main
package instead.
Bartłomiej
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 473 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <https://lists.archlinux.org/pipermail/aur-general/attachments/20160408/2f85d685/attachment.asc>
More information about the aur-general
mailing list