[aur-general] Request to check my PKGBUILD and suggest me some improvements
patrickeigensatz at gmail.com
Sat Aug 13 20:39:00 UTC 2016
Thanks, I changed this as well!
I thought if there was a variable for both I'd set both :)
Should I remove the md5sum? Is there a guarantee every Archsystem
has the md5sum and/or the sha256 command available?
Another question just popped in my mind:
How does namcap find dependencies of my package? How I can I be sure
it discovered all and I didn't forget one?
Florian Bruhin <me at the-compiler.org> schrieb am Sa., 13. Aug. 2016 um
> * Patrick Eigensatz via aur-general <aur-general at archlinux.org>
> [2016-08-13 20:18:05 +0000]:
> > Thank you very much for your ideas. I just pushed a new version of the
> > PKGBUILD
> > here:
> > https://aur.archlinux.org/cgit/aur.git/tree/PKGBUILD?h=qjournalctl
> > Are there further improvements? The point with the substitutions of
> > seems very handy to me!
> Why do you have both md5sums and sha256sums set? One of them should
> suffice ;)
> http://www.the-compiler.org | me at the-compiler.org (Mail/XMPP)
> GPG: 916E B0C8 FD55 A072 | http://the-compiler.org/pubkey.asc
> I love long mails! | http://email.is-not-s.ms/
More information about the aur-general