[aur-general] Trusted User application

[Nicola Squartini]

On Sun, 2016-07-24 at 05:23 -0700, Patrick Burroughs (Celti) wrote:
> perhaps it was sending both HTML and plaintext, signing the wrong
> one,
> and then mailman stripped the HTML (ruining the signature) once it
> was
> sent?
> 
> ~Celti

I was indeed sending both (I disabled HTML now), and it was signing
both. In fact following the procedure that I described above [1], gpg
was correctly verifing the content, and the text between the boundary
lines included both plain/text and HTML.

[1] https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc3156
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 473 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <https://lists.archlinux.org/pipermail/aur-general/attachments/20160724/2bea1df2/attachment.asc>