[aur-general] out of date packages?
jdashiel at panix.com
Thu May 5 14:57:38 UTC 2016
On Thu, 5 May 2016, Doug Newgard wrote:
> Date: Thu, 5 May 2016 10:22:45
> From: Doug Newgard <scimmia at archlinux.info>
> Reply-To: "Discussion about the Arch User Repository (AUR)"
> <aur-general at archlinux.org>
> To: aur-general at archlinux.org
> Subject: Re: [aur-general] out of date packages?
> On Thu, 5 May 2016 10:14:13 -0400
> Eli Schwartz <eschwartz93 at gmail.com> wrote:
>> On 05/05/2016 09:16 AM, Jude DaShiell wrote:
>>> What are proper criteria for flagging a package out of date? My reason
>>> for asking has to do with:
>> Well, it is currently flagged out of date:
>> But I don't know why, since upstream is apparently dead and the
>> community package is already on the latest (ancient) upstream release.
>> Is this because it got forked to continue support? I think that
>> qualifies as new software, and therefore a new package.
> You're right, but people can flag it out of date for whatever reason they want
> (and doing this a lot causes maintainers to ignore the flag). In this case,
> yes, it is because of a fork.
The fork is called oysttyer and was taken over by the oysttyer
organization and the original author created another package called texapp
to run on the adn social network.
More information about the aur-general