[aur-general] out of date packages?

[Johannes Löthberg]

On 05/05, Eli Schwartz wrote:
>On 05/05/2016 10:22 AM, Doug Newgard wrote:
>> You're right, but people can flag it out of date for whatever reason they want
>> (and doing this a lot causes maintainers to ignore the flag). In this case,
>> yes, it is because of a fork.
>>
>
>Naturally I am aware that people can do whatever ridiculous things they
>want. :)
>Of course, I don't know why they would do something so silly, but
>apparently they do anyway...
>
>The "this" was Jude's reason for asking, though.
>
>...
>
>The AUR can now show you the message left when flagging an out-of-date
>package in addition to the out-of-date status itself. Pity you can't see
>that in the repos as well.
>

It's possible, but you have to be logged into archweb to do it.

-- 
Sincerely,
  Johannes Löthberg
  PGP Key ID: 0x50FB9B273A9D0BB5
  https://theos.kyriasis.com/~kyrias/
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 1768 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <https://lists.archlinux.org/pipermail/aur-general/attachments/20160505/6ca3c39b/attachment.asc>