[aur-general] "pepper-flash" naming?

[Ralf Mardorf]

On Sun, 13 Nov 2016 15:12:56 -0500, Eli Schwartz wrote:
>I could think of a bunch of arbitrary names, not just pepper-flash or
>flashlugin-ppapi.

Since "PPAPI" is for "pepper plugin application programming interface"
it makes sense to stay with "pepper" and adding "flash" is useful,
because it explains, that it is related to the Macromedia/Adobe thingy.
"pepper-flash" makes sense.

On Sun, 13 Nov 2016 10:33:26 +0200, Det via aur-general wrote:
>"flashplugin-ppapi"

Makes no sense, since it means "flashplugin-pepperpluginapi". Why
mentioning two times "plugin"? "flashplugin-ppapi" corrected would be
"flashpplugin-api".