[aur-general] Should "base" packages be listed as dependencies?

[Doug Newgard]

On Wed, 22 Mar 2017 21:45:13 +0100
Baptiste Jonglez <baptiste at bitsofnetworks.org> wrote:
> 
> Am I missing something obvious?
> 
> Thanks,
> Baptiste

There's no specific rule about it. Some packagers will include packages in base
in the depends, some won't. It's completely up to them.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 488 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <https://lists.archlinux.org/pipermail/aur-general/attachments/20170322/58ee45c8/attachment.asc>