[aur-general] Should "base" packages be listed as dependencies?
scimmia at archlinux.info
Thu Mar 23 02:43:29 UTC 2017
On Wed, 22 Mar 2017 22:02:31 -0400
Daniel Micay via aur-general <aur-general at archlinux.org> wrote:
> On Thu, 2017-03-23 at 01:38 +0000, Giancarlo Razzolini wrote:
> > Em março 22, 2017 18:12 Doug Newgard escreveu:
> > >
> > > There's no specific rule about it. Some packagers will include
> > > packages in base
> > > in the depends, some won't. It's completely up to them.
> > >
> > But, if at least the maintainers built their packages using a clean
> > chroot, they
> > would know what they are missing from base to include on depends. I
> > don't think
> > we need to enforce that rule to the AUR, but it is a rule for repo
> > packages for
> > a good reason. We could, however, suggest on the wiki, if it isn't
> > already, that
> > even for the AUR, the *maintainers* build their packages using
> > devtools.
> > Cheers,
> > Giancarlo Razzolini
> Doesn't the standard chroot end up with all of base and base-devel or
> is that not currently the case?
All of base-devel, but not all of base.
More information about the aur-general