[aur-general] Should "base" packages be listed as dependencies?

Eli Schwartz eschwartz93 at gmail.com
Thu Mar 23 03:25:22 UTC 2017

On 03/22/2017 10:02 PM, Daniel Micay via aur-general wrote:
> Doesn't the standard chroot end up with all of base and base-devel or
> is that not currently the case?

The "standard chroot" is a help message in makechrootpkg saying
The chroot "root" directory must be created via the following
    mkarchroot <chrootdir>/root base-devel
and corresponding automation in archbuild.

mkarchroot is really just a btrfs/CHROOT_VERSION wrapper around pacstrap...

As I said earlier, perhaps this is something that could/should be rethought?

Eli Schwartz

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 833 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <https://lists.archlinux.org/pipermail/aur-general/attachments/20170322/c80a0273/attachment-0001.asc>

More information about the aur-general mailing list