[aur-general] [PRQ#11055] Deletion Request for dnscrypt-proxy-go | [PRQ#11056] Deletion Request for dnscrypt-proxy-go-git

[Jordan Glover]

On April 4, 2018 4:49 PM, Robin Broda via aur-general <aur-general at archlinux.org> wrote:

> On 04/04/2018 04:37 PM, Jordan Glover wrote:
> > 
> > The point is that the community package which doesn't build manually and
> > 
> > point to nonexistent sources is the one which should be deleted instead of
> > 
> > the one from AUR. If you prefer that upstream Archlinux instructions will look
> > 
> > the same as those for Ubuntu/Debian[*] then it will be done but it would mean
> > 
> > that Archlinux project in current form is a joke and you role in it isn't worth a
> > 
> > dime.
> 
> The package in [community] will be updated soon.
> 
> > 
> > Jordan
> 
> Regards, Rob

I'm sorry for the harsh words. If those requests were made AFTER update package
in repo there won't be this conversation. I found situation where killing other people
efforts to make things work, unacceptable without providing an alternative. Common
sense should prevail the rules.

Jordan