[aur-general] [PRQ#11055] Deletion Request for dnscrypt-proxy-go | [PRQ#11056] Deletion Request for dnscrypt-proxy-go-git
Golden_Miller83 at protonmail.ch
Wed Apr 4 15:23:34 UTC 2018
On April 4, 2018 4:49 PM, Robin Broda via aur-general <aur-general at archlinux.org> wrote:
> On 04/04/2018 04:37 PM, Jordan Glover wrote:
> > The point is that the community package which doesn't build manually and
> > point to nonexistent sources is the one which should be deleted instead of
> > the one from AUR. If you prefer that upstream Archlinux instructions will look
> > the same as those for Ubuntu/Debian[*] then it will be done but it would mean
> > that Archlinux project in current form is a joke and you role in it isn't worth a
> > dime.
> The package in [community] will be updated soon.
> > Jordan
> Regards, Rob
I'm sorry for the harsh words. If those requests were made AFTER update package
in repo there won't be this conversation. I found situation where killing other people
efforts to make things work, unacceptable without providing an alternative. Common
sense should prevail the rules.
More information about the aur-general