[aur-general] Moving xss-lock to community
ambrevar at gmail.com
Sat Feb 3 13:41:33 UTC 2018
David Runge <dave at sleepmap.de> writes:
>> I'm no systemd expert: what is the intent of the suggest systemd unit?
> This would only ensure, that lock already happens right before suspend
> (in the case, someone wants that).
> This use-case gets around the problem of showing a small portion of
> what's going on in your DE/WM right after suspend and only then
> IMHO locking before suspend is preferred, but that's probably a matter
> of taste.
You are probably right about that. I think however that this should be
reported upstream to systemd rather than being part of the xss-lock
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Size: 487 bytes
Desc: not available
More information about the aur-general