[aur-general] Special Removal of an Inactive TU: speps

[Eli Schwartz]

On 01/18/2018 04:05 PM, Thorsten Toepper wrote:
> First of all: Congratulations for becoming a TU, you should have applied
> sooner so I could've given you my "yes". :-)

Thanks! :)

> Rephrasing the bylaw to something like
> 
> "performed any action that required TU privileges on the AUR
> (*excluding* participation in votes for there is below rule)"
> 
> would solve the problem, that TUs may only act in the absolute
> background of participation votes, yet not taking care of any binary
> packages or AUR package management any more.

I would definitely agree that we need to clarify the bylaws on this
point, and I'll probably propose something soon.

I'm not sure what that means we should do about the current vote though.

-- 
Eli Schwartz
Bug Wrangler and Trusted User

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 833 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <https://lists.archlinux.org/pipermail/aur-general/attachments/20180118/55398a60/attachment.asc>