[aur-general] [tu-bylaws] [PATCH] Clarify the process for Special Removal of an inactive TU
Balló György
ballogyor at gmail.com
Tue Jan 23 19:16:33 UTC 2018
> Does anyone have any last-minute proposals to modify the wording for
> grammar etc. in the event that this is accepted?
Sounds good for me. But how can we check if a TU modify a user account
or do anything other than resolving package requests (which is tracked
on aur-requests mailing list)? Currently these actions are untracked on
aurweb, so we don't really know the last action. I think we need a
'last privileged action' field or 'privileged action log' or something
similar to be implemented in aurweb, so any TU could easily check if
the condition met or not.
--
György Balló
Trusted User
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 516 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <https://lists.archlinux.org/pipermail/aur-general/attachments/20180123/72cf6eee/attachment.asc>
More information about the aur-general
mailing list