[aur-general] [tu-bylaws] [PATCH] Clarify the process for Special Removal of an inactive TU

[Eli Schwartz]

On 01/23/2018 02:16 PM, Balló György via aur-general wrote:
>> Does anyone have any last-minute proposals to modify the wording for
>> grammar etc. in the event that this is accepted?
> 
> Sounds good for me. But how can we check if a TU modify a user account
> or do anything other than resolving package requests (which is tracked
> on aur-requests mailing list)? Currently these actions are untracked on
> aurweb, so we don't really know the last action. I think we need a
> 'last privileged action' field or 'privileged action log' or something
> similar to be implemented in aurweb, so any TU could easily check if
> the condition met or not.

We probably do need some way to track non-requests package deletions,
use of AUR_PRIVILEGED in the git backend, etc. But I will probably defer
to Lukas/Johannes for that, it sounds like it would involve php.

It's not like we were keeping track of this as we should up to now, so
that wouldn't really change.

-- 
Eli Schwartz
Bug Wrangler and Trusted User

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 833 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <https://lists.archlinux.org/pipermail/aur-general/attachments/20180123/60ecb5ea/attachment.asc>