[aur-general] [tu-bylaws] [PATCH] Clarify the process for Special Removal of an inactive TU

Eli Schwartz eschwartz at archlinux.org
Tue Jan 23 21:40:10 UTC 2018

On 01/23/2018 02:16 PM, Balló György via aur-general wrote:
>> Does anyone have any last-minute proposals to modify the wording for
>> grammar etc. in the event that this is accepted?
> Sounds good for me. But how can we check if a TU modify a user account
> or do anything other than resolving package requests (which is tracked
> on aur-requests mailing list)? Currently these actions are untracked on
> aurweb, so we don't really know the last action. I think we need a
> 'last privileged action' field or 'privileged action log' or something
> similar to be implemented in aurweb, so any TU could easily check if
> the condition met or not.

We probably do need some way to track non-requests package deletions,
use of AUR_PRIVILEGED in the git backend, etc. But I will probably defer
to Lukas/Johannes for that, it sounds like it would involve php.

It's not like we were keeping track of this as we should up to now, so
that wouldn't really change.

Eli Schwartz
Bug Wrangler and Trusted User

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 833 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <https://lists.archlinux.org/pipermail/aur-general/attachments/20180123/60ecb5ea/attachment.asc>

More information about the aur-general mailing list