[aur-general] TU Application: Daniel Bermond (dbermond)

Daniel Bermond danielbermond at gmail.com
Mon Oct 15 03:39:04 UTC 2018

On 10/14/18 7:16 PM, Levente Polyak via aur-general wrote:
> On 10/14/18 11:35 PM, Daniel Bermond via aur-general wrote:
>> I usually don't use pgp on my aur packages because people tend to
>> complain a lot about building issues. They fail to handle the keys and
>> start complaining to the packager, and this is a big stress. When
>> dealing with repository packages this is another story, of course. Since
>> this was raised as a main issue, I'll be adding the pgp checks back again.
> So let me summarize what you are saying, correct me if im wrong:
> You fully know whats all the gizzle with gpg. Instead of acting like a
> trustable user who follows best practice and spreads good advice and
> helps teaching people about how all this works properly you prefere to
> pull the lazy card because its what? big stress? Serious?
> I don't even find words to describe how untrustworthy this is to the
> community to prefer to remove GPG signatures instead of educating users?
> PS: Did you hear of pinned comments?
> WOW I'm speechless at best.
Sorry then. I'll be using gpg checks whenever it's available from now on.

Best regards,
Daniel Bermond

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 488 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <https://lists.archlinux.org/pipermail/aur-general/attachments/20181015/5fba601d/attachment-0001.asc>

More information about the aur-general mailing list