[aur-general] kodi-devel-bin

[pavel.finkelshtein at gmail.com]

On Sat, 2019-08-17 at 11:30 +0200, Ike Devolder via aur-general wrote:
> On 12/08/2019 20:18, Eli Schwartz wrote:
> > @Ike,
> > 
> > I'm curious what made you choose to call it "kodi-bin" instead of what
> > seems to me like the more descriptive and accurate "kodi-x11". Perhaps
> > it might make sense to change the pkgname?
> 
> kodi-bin was chosen to have kodi-x11 as the default, if all "bin"
> packages provide kodi-bin and kodi depends on "kodi-bin", by default
> there would be kodi-gdbm installed, which most people can't actually
What do you think about kodi-default-x11? Same hack, but looks prettier
☺

> use. So by having kodi-bin as an actual package which holds kodi-x11
> that is still most used, users of kodi-wayland or kodi-gdbm can install
> those alongside or alone to suit there needs.
> 
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 833 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <https://lists.archlinux.org/pipermail/aur-general/attachments/20190817/774387ff/attachment.sig>