ike.devolder at gmail.com
Sat Aug 17 09:30:53 UTC 2019
On 12/08/2019 20:18, Eli Schwartz wrote:
> I'm curious what made you choose to call it "kodi-bin" instead of what
> seems to me like the more descriptive and accurate "kodi-x11". Perhaps
> it might make sense to change the pkgname?
kodi-bin was chosen to have kodi-x11 as the default, if all "bin"
packages provide kodi-bin and kodi depends on "kodi-bin", by default
there would be kodi-gdbm installed, which most people can't actually
use. So by having kodi-bin as an actual package which holds kodi-x11
that is still most used, users of kodi-wayland or kodi-gdbm can install
those alongside or alone to suit there needs.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Size: 833 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
More information about the aur-general