[aur-general] package review request: gog-pyre

[JereBear]

> > Thanks for the info about the local pseudo-scheme. I've made a note to
> > file a feature request on bugs.archlinux.org, asking for documentation.
> > (Obligatory "and maybe a patch, but don't count on it.") And I'll switch to
> > using it.
>
> Documentation is always good! You're not the first one to ask about
> where local:// is documented, I think, but documentation issues are
> difficult to remember without a bug report when the people most likely
> to be writing documentation think it is obvious because they've read the
> implementation. :p

https://bugs.archlinux.org/task/61294