[aur-general] aur client

[Giancarlo Razzolini]

Em outubro 29, 2019 14:09 Eli Schwartz via aur-general escreveu:
> 
> Correction: there is "a blacklist", but it's only used to prevent
> namespace conflicts for users who attempt to upload packages named the
> same pkgname as a package in the binary repos.
> 
> It is correct to say we have never attempted to blacklist names which
> "shouldn't be allowed to exist as packages because $person dislikes the
> name".
> 
> "aur" isn't inherently a bad name, I could conceive of it being the name
> for a package which installs the aur.archlinux.org software, though
> "aurweb" would be an even better name. ;)
> 

Indeed, a there are two blacklists, one that blacklists repo packages, so
they are not uploaded to the AUR. That one is updated automatically.

There's a second blacklist, but that one has no way to update, other than
through the DB, hence my confusion.

I think we should probably start adding a few packages to that list.

Regards,
Giancarlo Razzolini
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 833 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <https://lists.archlinux.org/pipermail/aur-general/attachments/20191029/1c75f227/attachment-0001.sig>