[aur-general] SGE

[tom at tswartz.net]

On Wed, Oct 14, 2020 at 09:03:26PM +0200, alad via aur-general wrote:
> On 14/10/2020 17:16, Manhong Dai via aur-general wrote:
> > Hi Bruno,
> 
> Top-posting, do you know what it means?
> 
> Do not do this: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Top-posting
> 
> But do this: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
> or https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Bottom-posting
> 
> Again https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/Code_of_conduct#Top_posting
> 
> Don't expect anyone to take you seriously if you keep doing this even after
> being asked not to, repeatedly.
> 
> Alad
> 
> > 
> > 	Thanks a lot for confirming that I didn't receive Orphaning
> > email!
> > 
> > 	I did receive the comment. I actually checked the pull request
> > a little, but decided not to reply because I didn't want to be
> > negative. I totally believe the current maintainer has a better format
> > of PKGBUILD (well, except his pkgver mistake). Now let me comment a few
> > things on SGE.
> > 
> > 	In the SGE package comment.
> > 
> > 1, The current maintainer blamed me "连pkgver都填错这个真的是有点不可容忍了". Google
> > translation: "It’s really intolerable that even pkgver was filled in
> > wrong."
> > 
> > Now it turned out that the current maintainer made the mistake.....
> > 
> > 2, He also said "通过.install在post install阶段装了一大堆包管理器没有接管的文件", Google
> > translation "A lot of files that the package manager did not take over
> > were installed in the post install stage through .install".
> > 
> >    This could be a disaster if somebody want to upgrade SGE by uninstall
> > and re-install. SGE has been a very special software because it needs
> > some post installation to let user specify a lot of host/jobs/queue
> > configuration. Thus all files are put under /opt/sge for the legacy
> > reason.
> > 
> > 
> > Best,
> > Manhong
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 	
> > On Wed, 2020-10-14 at 18:58 +0400, Archange wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > > 
> > > Le 14/10/2020 à 18:47, Manhong Dai via aur-general a écrit :
> > > > 2, Force an AUR package maintainer to join AUR-general, or send
> > > > every
> > > > notification to the package maintainer, as I never received any
> > > > email
> > > > notification about orphaning SGE.
> > > I’m not commenting on everything else here, but regarding this point:
> > > subscription to aur-general is not required, and every notifications
> > > are
> > > sent to the package maintainer… or at least should be, because a bug
> > > introduced some months ago broke that (see
> > > https://gitlab.archlinux.org/archlinux/aurweb/-/merge_requests/6).
> > > 
> > > So indeed you did not receive the Orphaning requests notifications.
> > > But
> > > you did receive comments on the AUR page, and you did receive the
> > > emails
> > > to which you responded and that told you to *stop top-posting*.
> > > 
> > > Regards,
> > > Bruno/Archange

Excellent use of top posting yourself, Alad.

Cheers,

-- 
Tom Swartz

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 833 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <https://lists.archlinux.org/pipermail/aur-general/attachments/20201014/4c975742/attachment.sig>