[aur-general] SGE

[alad]

On 14/10/2020 21:09, tom at tswartz.net wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 14, 2020 at 09:03:26PM +0200, alad via aur-general wrote:
>> On 14/10/2020 17:16, Manhong Dai via aur-general wrote:
>>> Hi Bruno,
>> Top-posting, do you know what it means?
>>
>> Do not do this: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Top-posting
>>
>> But do this: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
>> or https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Bottom-posting
>>
>> Again https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/Code_of_conduct#Top_posting
>>
>> Don't expect anyone to take you seriously if you keep doing this even after
>> being asked not to, repeatedly.
>>
>> Alad
>>
>>> 	Thanks a lot for confirming that I didn't receive Orphaning
>>> email!
>>>
>>> 	I did receive the comment. I actually checked the pull request
>>> a little, but decided not to reply because I didn't want to be
>>> negative. I totally believe the current maintainer has a better format
>>> of PKGBUILD (well, except his pkgver mistake). Now let me comment a few
>>> things on SGE.
>>>
>>> 	In the SGE package comment.
>>>
>>> 1, The current maintainer blamed me "连pkgver都填错这个真的是有点不可容忍了". Google
>>> translation: "It’s really intolerable that even pkgver was filled in
>>> wrong."
>>>
>>> Now it turned out that the current maintainer made the mistake.....
>>>
>>> 2, He also said "通过.install在post install阶段装了一大堆包管理器没有接管的文件", Google
>>> translation "A lot of files that the package manager did not take over
>>> were installed in the post install stage through .install".
>>>
>>>     This could be a disaster if somebody want to upgrade SGE by uninstall
>>> and re-install. SGE has been a very special software because it needs
>>> some post installation to let user specify a lot of host/jobs/queue
>>> configuration. Thus all files are put under /opt/sge for the legacy
>>> reason.
>>>
>>>
>>> Best,
>>> Manhong
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> 	
>>> On Wed, 2020-10-14 at 18:58 +0400, Archange wrote:
>>>> Hi,
>>>>
>>>> Le 14/10/2020 à 18:47, Manhong Dai via aur-general a écrit :
>>>>> 2, Force an AUR package maintainer to join AUR-general, or send
>>>>> every
>>>>> notification to the package maintainer, as I never received any
>>>>> email
>>>>> notification about orphaning SGE.
>>>> I’m not commenting on everything else here, but regarding this point:
>>>> subscription to aur-general is not required, and every notifications
>>>> are
>>>> sent to the package maintainer… or at least should be, because a bug
>>>> introduced some months ago broke that (see
>>>> https://gitlab.archlinux.org/archlinux/aurweb/-/merge_requests/6).
>>>>
>>>> So indeed you did not receive the Orphaning requests notifications.
>>>> But
>>>> you did receive comments on the AUR page, and you did receive the
>>>> emails
>>>> to which you responded and that told you to *stop top-posting*.
>>>>
>>>> Regards,
>>>> Bruno/Archange
> Excellent use of top posting yourself, Alad.

Except it's not (interleaved, right below "Hi Bruno"). Nice try, though.

Alad

>
> Cheers,
>