[aur-general] SGE Orphaning

[Manhong Dai]

On Mon, 2020-10-19 at 11:17 -0700, Brett Cornwall wrote:
> On 2020-10-19 12:59, Manhong Dai via aur-general wrote:
> > Dear Trust User,
> > 
> >         I submitted an Orphaning request in both comment area and
> > ticket system. Feel free to let me know if there is anything I need
> > to
> > do to follow up.
> > 
> >         My email address is daimh at umich.edu , just in case I missed
> > any emails.
> > 
> > Best,
> > Manhong
> 
> It's been made clear that you're not willing to listen to TUs and
> would 
> rather engage in what appears to be bordering on harassment with the
> new 
> maintainer. If you had demonstrated a clear attempt to actually 
> understand the responses to your mails in this list then there might 
> have been recourse. As it stands, you're merely digging your own
> grave.

I am more than willing to listen to TU, as well as any other users.

As what you said is all opinion, it is hard for me to reply. But let me
try.

If you referring to that I top-posted before, I already apologized.
Also a fun fact, I have been top-posting in my whole life, and I never
saw a non-top-posting email in the past two decades in USA. Further it
was very hard to read non-top-post emails on phone, at least for me for
now. Or if you think I am harassing the new maintainer, please show me
what words are harassment, I am happy to apologize and modify it. At
least I didn't call anybody "zero knowledge", or "know nothing", etc,
did I?

Please shed some light on  what I or any other AUR maintainers who
didn't register AUR-general should do in this case, before the package
was taken over.

If it is I should always reply comment, that's a very high bar, at
least for me, especially if I see a simple patch file is split into
many small files.

Best,
Manhong

> If the new maintainer wants your help, he'll add you as a co-
> maintainer. 
> If they do not, then leave them be and put your PKGBUILD elsewhere.