[aur-general] Package Request and/or TU Application

Caleb Maclennan caleb at alerque.com
Thu Aug 19 21:22:15 UTC 2021

On 2021-08-19 23:24, Kevin Morris via aur-general wrote:
> I think I'm going to in fact commit that in as a new route for Python
> dependencies within a few days; it'll at least remove a dependency on
> unmaintained packages in the future.
> That being said, I'd still vouch for the package in question for
> [community], as it's quite useful and seems like it's been stable
> for long enough in upstream.

Lets hold off for a few days then and see what direction you go with 
aurweb. For now I think it's fine in the AUR until there is more clear 
direction. I don't want to package something that I don't use just 
because it might be generally useful for something or other. If it's 
actually needed for something then sure. Being able to run an aurweb 
instance using only distro packages is probably a worthwhile thing, but 
there doesn't seem to be a rush either. Don't let not being in 
[community] be a blocker for aurweb development, but lets hold off to 
see what the need is actually going to be.


More information about the aur-general mailing list