[aur-general] Package Request and/or TU Application
Caleb Maclennan
caleb at alerque.com
Thu Aug 19 21:22:15 UTC 2021
On 2021-08-19 23:24, Kevin Morris via aur-general wrote:
> I think I'm going to in fact commit that in as a new route for Python
> dependencies within a few days; it'll at least remove a dependency on
> unmaintained packages in the future.
>
> That being said, I'd still vouch for the package in question for
> [community], as it's quite useful and seems like it's been stable
> for long enough in upstream.
Lets hold off for a few days then and see what direction you go with
aurweb. For now I think it's fine in the AUR until there is more clear
direction. I don't want to package something that I don't use just
because it might be generally useful for something or other. If it's
actually needed for something then sure. Being able to run an aurweb
instance using only distro packages is probably a worthwhile thing, but
there doesn't seem to be a rush either. Don't let not being in
[community] be a blocker for aurweb development, but lets hold off to
see what the need is actually going to be.
Caleb
More information about the aur-general
mailing list