[aur-general] Package `pijul` in both AUR and Community-Testing

[alad]

On 02/07/2021 01:35, Eli Schwartz via aur-general wrote:
> On 7/1/21 8:34 AM, Morten Linderud via aur-general wrote:
>> runc, which the entire container ecosystem has been depending on the past 7 years,
>> got it's first stable release last week after almost 100 release candidates :)
>
> The very first version of runc in the official repos was 0.1.0, not
> 0.1.0alpha1 or anything of the sort.

The point is that the official repos had 13 times an 1.0.0rc for runc.

Alad

>
> Many projects get packaged and relied upon in a stable manner for a long
> time before hitting their 1.0 milestone releases, and this is completely
> fine. I've packaged a bunch of them myself too.
>
> This is completely unrelated to any version of any software that states
> that it's an alpha edition of e.g. "1.0.0". Typical practice is to
> package 0.9.x or whatever, not 1.0.0 alpha48, since the former, despite
> being pre-1.0, is still denoting a more stable version than "alpha48".
>
>