[aur-general] Subdirectories: is my workaround acceptable?

[Leonidas Spyropoulos]

On 16/06/2022 17:42, Claudia Pellegrino via aur-general wrote:
> Hi fellow AUR maintainers,

Hello Claudia,

> [..]
> I started working around that limitation by including a tarball [2] with
> my PKGBUILDs instead of a .vscode directory. While aurweb would have
> rejected that directory, it does accept the tarball.

The AUR is for hosting the PKGBUILD files and any patches / sources 
required to build those. Supplementary files such as IDE settings etc 
should not be there because they are not required for building said 
packages.

Cheers,
Leonidas

-- 
Leonidas Spyropoulos
PGP: 59E43E106B247368

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: OpenPGP_signature
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 840 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <https://lists.archlinux.org/pipermail/aur-general/attachments/20220616/8c731540/attachment.sig>