[aur-requests] [PRQ#2846] Deletion Request for nx-all

[Chris T.R.]

Actually, yeah, that sounds much better: have both packages, v3 and v4.
Need any help with the v4 packaging?

hk:v5sw4hw3pr6XMFck4edu6ln5/6ma4os6UedVcr4bo7ga4DBXCa32p/9+/8h7et6S

On Sat, Mar 28, 2015 at 4:41 AM, Muflone <webreg at vbsimple.net> wrote:

> >FreeNX 4 is not the same of FreeNX 3 and cannot provide the same
> >functionality, therefore until I find a valid reason to break
> >compatibility with NX and with the wiki itself, I won't update FreeNX
> >to v4.
> >
> >If you want I could submit a separated FreeNX v4 package.
> A better approach would be to create a separated package for older FreeNX
> 3 and update the nx-all package to v4 (if it works).
> --
> Muflone
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.archlinux.org/pipermail/aur-requests/attachments/20150328/e88faab6/attachment.html>