[aur-requests] [PRQ#4870] Deletion Request for vulkan

[Eric Engeström]

Hi all,
This request has been rejected by Muflone, and I don't quite understand; is
there a reason to keep these packages around?
I'm pretty sure my packages in the AUR have been superseded by Laurent
Carlier's (lcarlier/lordheavy) in [extra], and can only confuse users.

Cheers,
Eric

On Sun, Feb 21, 2016 at 12:45 AM, <notify at aur.archlinux.org> wrote:

> 1ace [1] filed a deletion request for vulkan [2]:
>
> extra/vulkan-sdk & extra/vulkan-icd-loader replace these vulkan-sdk &
> vulkan-loader.
>
> Not sure what to do about the different name though; should I push an
> update with the new name (vulkan-icd-loader) and `replaces=(vulkan-
> loader)` to make those who installed my package use the new name, and
> in a week (when hopefully people have upgraded to the new name)
> actually delete this one?
>
> [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/1ace/
> [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/pkgbase/vulkan/
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.archlinux.org/pipermail/aur-requests/attachments/20160223/39847b9e/attachment.html>