[aur-requests] [PRQ#4870] Deletion Request for vulkan
eric at engestrom.ch
Tue Feb 23 23:31:14 UTC 2016
This request has been rejected by Muflone, and I don't quite understand; is
there a reason to keep these packages around?
I'm pretty sure my packages in the AUR have been superseded by Laurent
Carlier's (lcarlier/lordheavy) in [extra], and can only confuse users.
On Sun, Feb 21, 2016 at 12:45 AM, <notify at aur.archlinux.org> wrote:
> 1ace  filed a deletion request for vulkan :
> extra/vulkan-sdk & extra/vulkan-icd-loader replace these vulkan-sdk &
> Not sure what to do about the different name though; should I push an
> update with the new name (vulkan-icd-loader) and `replaces=(vulkan-
> loader)` to make those who installed my package use the new name, and
> in a week (when hopefully people have upgraded to the new name)
> actually delete this one?
>  https://aur.archlinux.org/account/1ace/
>  https://aur.archlinux.org/pkgbase/vulkan/
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the aur-requests