jvinet at zeroflux.org
Fri Oct 27 16:42:12 EDT 2006
On Thu, 26 Oct 2006 17:11:05 -0500
"Aaron Griffin" <aaronmgriffin at gmail.com> wrote:
> No no no.... you're missing the point. Because reading individual
> files is slow, we need a new backend. This does not imply a database
> backend is a good idea. It implies a single-file solution is ideal,
> yes. What I've been trying to show was that, considering the
> slow-down is from reading hundreds of files, that does not imply a
> database. ANY single-file solution would work.
Heh, well almost any. See pacman1 for an implementation that did not
work. Well, it worked, but it was painfully slow -- sequential
searching through a massive text file to find the package in question.
More information about the pacman-dev