[pacman-dev] Arch neutrral packages
Jeff 'codemac' Mickey
jeff at archlinux.org
Mon Apr 9 18:59:10 EDT 2007
* On Monday, April 09 2007, Andrew Fyfe wrote:
>Is it worth adding something like arch=(NOARCH) for packages that are
>arch neutral (ie they only contain text files, scripts...) so we don't
>have 2 identical packages for i686 and x86_64.
>
>Andrew
The PKGBUILD's would be the exact same, as a matter of fact, they would be
built from the same source...
And where do you suggest we put the arch neutral packages? current,
current64 and currentNONE?
I like the current setup, it minimizes complexity and is perfectly verbose.
--
.: [ + carpe diem totus tuus + ] :.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://archlinux.org/pipermail/pacman-dev/attachments/20070409/16db9ad2/attachment.pgp>
More information about the pacman-dev
mailing list