[pacman-dev] CVS update of pacman-lib (NEWS)
aaronmgriffin at gmail.com
Fri Feb 16 17:04:01 EST 2007
On 2/16/07, Roman Kyrylych <roman.kyrylych at gmail.com> wrote:
> Not exactly correct, IMHO. Dependencies was removed in pacman 2.9.8
> too, but not on failure.
> More correct would be " - dependencies now removed on build failure too", IMHO.
If we're debating grammar, either one is correct 8)
saying "build success or failure" implies nothing about the previous
state - neither could have worked, or only one could have worked...
but I'm being nit-picky 8)
More information about the pacman-dev