[pacman-dev] CVS update of pacman-lib (NEWS)

[Roman Kyrylych]

2007/2/17, Aaron Griffin <aaronmgriffin at gmail.com>:
> On 2/16/07, Roman Kyrylych <roman.kyrylych at gmail.com> wrote:
> > Not exactly correct, IMHO. Dependencies was removed in pacman 2.9.8
> > too, but not on failure.
> > More correct would be " - dependencies now removed on build failure too", IMHO.
>
> If we're debating grammar, either one is correct 8)
> saying "build success or failure" implies nothing about the previous
> state - neither could have worked, or only one could have worked...
> but I'm being nit-picky 8)

OK then. :)

-- 
Roman Kyrylych (Роман Кирилич)