[pacman-dev] 'replaces' confusion

Aaron Griffin aaronmgriffin at gmail.com
Mon Feb 26 11:10:34 EST 2007

On 2/26/07, Dan McGee <dpmcgee at gmail.com> wrote:
> But shouldn't we be reading conflicts and provides anyway in the case
> of a sysupgrade?

Yeah, but those are both *after* the package is elected for upgrade...
that is, the set of packages has been significantly reduced.

I'm not saying this makes it worthwhile, really, just pointing it out.

More information about the pacman-dev mailing list