[pacman-dev] 'replaces' confusion

Travis Willard travisw at wmpub.ca
Mon Feb 26 15:49:08 EST 2007

On Mon, 26 Feb 2007 09:36:58 -0800 (PST)
eliott at cactuswax.net wrote:

> I say choose a single backend. Modify it as needed, but keep the
> backend choice simple. Ie... one backend.


While user-selectable backend would be keen, it's fluff that I don't
see as necessary to pacman's greater function.  One relatively quick
and functional backend would probably make everybody's life easier.

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://archlinux.org/pipermail/pacman-dev/attachments/20070226/1f4a1359/attachment.pgp>

More information about the pacman-dev mailing list