[pacman-dev] MD5/SHA* why?

Dan McGee dpmcgee at gmail.com
Tue Jul 3 15:55:06 EDT 2007


On 7/3/07, Andrew Fyfe <andrew at neptune-one.net> wrote:
> I asked this question a while ago about makepkg now I'm asking about
> pacman... why do we need support for multiple checksum types? What's
> wrong with md5?

Frugalware switched to using sha1sums, so that is a big reason. If you
can find a good reason to pull support for it, let us know, but as of
right now I don't see a reason to remove it, even if we don't use it.
Any other distribution using pacman may want to use it, so the option
is there.

-Dan




More information about the pacman-dev mailing list