[pacman-dev] Maelstrom(Pacman in C#) project brief
VMiklos
vmiklos at frugalware.org
Sun Jul 22 14:57:53 EDT 2007
Hello,
Na Fri, Jul 20, 2007 at 05:40:40PM +0300, Bozhidar Batsov <lordbad at e-card.bg> pisal(a):
> Well I have no intention to fork Arch. I strive to make a product 100%
> compatible with the existing, but I want to offer through it a few
> things that are missing in pacman and a couple of newer technologies. I
> don't think that mono is a bad thing just because .NET is a Microsoft
> product. After all Miguel de Icaza has stated many times that if he had
> mono 8 years ago there wouldn't be one line of C code in GNOME. I
> personally consider it to be a much better framework than java. Style
> and consistency are almost perfect here. Pascal notation for methods,
> camel for vars, great generics, great datatypes, security...
let's say you would write this in python or perl, we would have the same
problem: pacman is a lowlevel tool, it should be fast and have as less
deps as possible. mono can be a great tool but are you sure it's nice to
have the whole mono framework in an install cd?
- VMiklos
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://archlinux.org/pipermail/pacman-dev/attachments/20070722/889500f5/attachment.pgp>
More information about the pacman-dev
mailing list