[pacman-dev] Lock file location
dpmcgee at gmail.com
Mon Jun 11 11:21:03 EDT 2007
On 6/11/07, Travis Willard <travis at archlinux.org> wrote:
> On Mon, 11 Jun 2007 10:40:15 -0400, Dan McGee wrote
> > Is this acceptable to everyone? The benefit it
> > gives us is if this location is writable, the DB is surely writable
> > by the user running pacman, and we can remove the dependence on the
> > pacman user being root.
> It sounds reasonable to me, but in the 10 minutes of thought I've given to it
> just now, I can't visualize a case where we wouldn't need to be root when the
> database needs to be locked anyway. Locked DB generally means writing to DB,
> ie adding/removing pkgs, which requires root anyways. Am I wrong?
I'm thinking outside of the box here. What if I, as a normal user,
want to install packages in a chroot environment? It would use a
separate pacman DB and separate root directory. In addition, the
biggest advantage is taking pacman and using it to install packages
elsewhere, such as on Dreamhost in my home directory.
More information about the pacman-dev