[pacman-dev] pacman 3.1 release ?

[Nagy Gabor]

Hi!
And please don't forget about the PS of
http://www.archlinux.org/pipermail/pacman-dev/2007-August/009078.html
data field of pmsyncpkg_t is used iff type == PM_SYNC_TYPE_REPLACE now, so we
could use (and rename?) that field as replaces in all cases to avoid the problem
above, and so pmsyncpkg_t would be a bit nicer (see alpm_sync_pkg_free);-).
So PM_SYNC_TYPE_REPLACE is not needed IMHO (we record to the database explicit
or depend reason only): (data != NULL) <=> (type == PM_SYNC_TYPE_REPLACE) if you
keep my advice.
Bye, ngaba


----------------------------------------------------
SZTE Egyetemi Könyvtár - http://www.bibl.u-szeged.hu
This mail sent through IMP: http://horde.org/imp/