[pacman-dev] pacman 3.1 release ?

[Xavier]

On Tue, Sep 18, 2007 at 02:12:25PM +0200, Nagy Gabor wrote:
> Conclusion:
> 1. If you don't want to resolve target<->target conflicts, our life will be much
> easier: the problem becomes trivial.
> 2. However if you want to resolve target<->target conflicts, please read:
> http://www.archlinux.org/pipermail/pacman-dev/2007-August/009098.html
> 3. We are sitting on this problem for ~1.5 months, we (mostly I) discussed it in
>  10+ mails, so it's time to do something in the code too ;-)
> Bye, ngaba
> 
> 

Well, I'm all for going the easy way 1. :)
I think the old behavior is acceptable, and that we can keep it for now,
and avoid breaking the few pactests that depend on it.
Your patch just needs to be slightly edited for doing that, right?