[pacman-dev] [GIT] The official pacman repository branch, master, updated. v3.1.2-75-g73ac9f7

[Xavier]

On Mon, Mar 03, 2008 at 04:19:11PM +0100, Nagy Gabor wrote:
> My opinion: imho between two major libalpm releases we are allowed to tune it
> [line now ;-] (otherwise we should release only bugfix releases in the future).
> I may have misinterpreted the reason of revert, but I had "stable API" feeling
> only (from frugalware).
> In these situations some kind of pminfo_t-like stuff with
> alpm_info_get_dl_total() accessors might be a bit more transparent.
> 
> I don't know whether the original patch was good or not, but hopefully in the
> future we will rework the whole transaction system -- so the API as well, if needed.
> 

I have no idea what you are trying to say here. In the same post, you talk
about keeping a stable API, and totally reworking the current API.

Btw, you did notice this change was on the master branch, which means it will
only be part of 3.2, right?